Almotamar.net - Yemen’s Human Rights Ministry on Wednesday refuted contents of a report by the Human Rights Watch (HRW) issued in the mid of last December regarding the false information and prejudiced frivolities on the situations in some Yemeni provinces.

In an explanatory response issued on Wednesday, the ministry emphasized that the report issued by the organisation on the situations in the western and eastern provinces contained abundance of false and truth less information, allegations and realities which the reality denies them.

The ministry said in its response that if the Yemeni government was dealing transparently and sincerely with all international reports so that to see flaws and slips that might affect its efforts and that is to remove the causes and tackle the outcomes for aim of enhancing
Human rights and their basic freedoms, the ministry believes mechanisms and foundations for monitoring human rights is a positive phenomenon helping in commitment by emerging democracies to issues of these natural rights inalienable and there is not division of their essential contents.

The ministry response mentioned, “ But we have found out in the Human Rights Watch a dimension incompatible wit the aspired for target and a political investment of human rights in Yemen precluding availability of better guarantees for the protection of human rights and public liberties.”

The reply added that a scrutinizing look into the content of the report indicate that its preparing sides had adopted ready-made formulas supported by pre judgments that made it lose the condition of impartiality that required to be there in any report related to monitor ting violations and analyzing them, clarifying that the report does not differentiate between the concept of fighting the crime and the violation. The first is legitimate and stipulated in the constitution and the law and aims at protecting the rights of people and their honour and properties and the other is an aggression without any legal support.

It said the report does not point out the field sources and references from which it had derived the information and upon which it had monitored the alleged violations and dealt with them as realities that actually occurred and to be satisfied only with information mentioned by opposition newspapers or fabricated images on the internet . It said the authors of the report do not know the compulsory legal measures that the government might resort to in defence of the homeland and the citizens’ interests and enforcing the law and its sovereignty.

The ministry has also reviewed detailed facts that refute frivolities and information contained in the organisation report.